.

Monday, May 13, 2019

Foodmart, Inc. Paper Research Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

Foodmart, Inc. - Research Paper ExampleContractual subject is an important element of a contract. indeed an insane, bankrupt or a person not of legal age cannot make a binding contract. In this case if Jeremy was not of legal age yet, then the contract was invalid and a round off Sales Used auto has no legal claim for breach of contract. The only refine for the railroad car seller lies in equity which comes in to cure the hostility of the crude law of contract. An equitable remedy would require Jeremy to give back the car and also forfeit the sums paid as he had already used the car. There is no legal remedy for the breach of contract as the lack of capacity makes the contract void. If Jeremy never returned the car out of his own volition then it would be hard for the car seller to claim breach of contract.The most important elements of a contract are offer and acceptance. In this scenario the question is whether a contract can be implied on the basis of the promise that Bri an made to harry. The common law doctrine of promissory estoppel operates to imply world of a contract in this scenario. Promissory estoppel comes to existence where a person by his word makes a representation which is relied on by the other break-dance to his or her detriment. In such a case the maker of the stamen is foreseed from denying what he represented. In this case Brian represented to harry that he would sell the trains to him. Harry acted on this representation to his detriment as he borrowed bills from his aunt to build a room for the trains. Thus in this case the doctrine of promissory estoppel operates to preclude Brian from denying the existence of a contract to sell the trains to Harry. The most important element of promissory estoppel is that the other person has to rely on the representation and suffer harm because he acted on the representation. These two requirements have been complete in this case.The question here is whether there was a contract between

No comments:

Post a Comment