Wednesday, March 27, 2019
Socrates and His Innocence :: essays research papers
Socrates and His InnocenceSocrates lived such a private life that it lead to the most important apocalypse of his entire life. He would go about his life doing nothing besides self-examination. In examining his life so strenuously others would come to him to be taught, or to have their children be taught by Socrates. They would offer him money and he would refuse. They would do whatever they could to learn anything Socrates had to teach. What they did not know is that Socrates was not teaching anyone he was simply going about his usual life and people dear happened to learn from it. This was also why Socrates was put on trial. He was brought up on twain charges, one of impiety and the other of corrupting the youth. These two charges set the course for the last month of his life.Socrates was indicted to a philander of law of nature on the charges of impiety, and the corruption of the youth of Athens. Three different workforce brought these charges upon Socrates. These work fo rce represented those that Socrates examined in his search to find out if the Delphic military mission was consecutive. In that search he found that none of the men that promoted what they believed that they knew was true was in fact completely false. This made those men so furious that they band together and indicted Socrates on the charges of impiety and the corruption of the youth. Socrates then went to court and did what he could to refute the charges that were brought against him.Socrates starts by speaking of his first accusers. He speaks of the men that they talked to about his impiety and says that those that they persuaded in that Socrates is impious, that they themselves do not believe in gods (18c2). He tells the court of how long they have been accusing him of impiety. He states that they radius to others when they were at an impressionable age (18c5). These two reasons alone should have been ethical enough to refute the first accusers of how they were wrong about him but Socrates went on. He leaves the first accusers alone because since they accused him a long time agone it was not relevant in the current case and began to refute the randomness accusers. Socrates vindicates his innocence by stating that the many have heard what he has taught in public and that many of those that he taught were present in the court that day.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment